ACR and
the Uniform Mediation Act (UMA)
ACR's Conditional
Approval
The Association for Conflict Resolution
conditionally
approved the Uniform Mediation Act (UMA)
during the ACR Board of Directors April 20-21,
2002 meeting. The UMA was drafted by the National
Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State
Laws (NCCUSL), in collaboration with the ABA
Section of Dispute Resolution and with the active
involvement of ACR Official Observers Gregory
Firestone and Dennis Sharp, in 2001.
Status of the Uniform
Mediation Act
The final Act, which was approved and
recommended for enactment in all U.S. states by
NCCUSL in 2001, may be viewed on the
NCCUSL web
site. The UMA has been introduced in a number of
states, and has been enacted in ten states:
·
District of Columbia as
B16-0145
·
Illinois
as
HB 2146
·
Iowa
as SB 323
·
Nebraska
as
LB 255
·
New Jersey
as A841
·
Ohio as
HB 303
·
South Dakota
·
Utah
as
SB 61
·
Vermont
as
H. 33
·
Washington as
SB 5173
Text
updated: 07/30/08
ACR's Role in the
Drafting of the Uniform Mediation Act
-
Uniform Mediation
Act: Are We There Yet?
This article, by Gregory Firestone and Dennis
Sharp, ACR's Official Observers to the NCCUSL
UMA Drafting Committee, highlights revisions
made to the UMA, and outlines how the Drafts
have met or fallen short of ACR expectations.
ACR Official Responses
to Drafts of the UMA
-
ACR Response
to UMA Draft -- Feb. 4, 2002
ACR's letter to the NCCUSL and ABA Drafting
Committees confirming that ACR neither endorses
or opposes the Uniform Mediation Act (UMA),
because substantive changes were made to the
UMA after August 13, 2001 when ACR had communicated
its support.
-
ACR Response
to UMA draft--July 24, 2001
ACR's response to the "Draft for Approval"
Uniform Mediation Act, in the form of a letter
from then-President of ACR Arnold Shienvold
to the NCCUSL and ABA UMA Drafting Committees.
|
The
MassUMA Working Group provides a helpful UMA summary:
http://www.massuma.net/umachart.html.
|